E-Learning Platforms Analysis – Modern Review
Abstract
E-learning is a novel instructional technique for imparting necessary information and skills to students. This article gives a thorough examination of the current state of e-learning approaches in organizations. The authors also assess the efficacy of e-learning by analyzing the current research articles. This study is presented and evaluated in several models to explain student intention to use an e-learning system as a substitute for traditional classroom learning or as a stand-alone distant education approach. The results of a survey related to eLearning platforms were reviewed by other researchers to determine the identified discoveries and uncover the research gaps. This work is unique as it contributes to the current literature discussion. The article's scientific uniqueness also includes a large-scale investigation that describes the author's theoretical and practical prerequisites. A critical examination of the literature is offered in this paper to establish a more realistic foundation for e-learning success. This paper reviews various e-learning tools and presents visualizations of web search data that display the popularity of electronic learning systems.
Keywords: e-learning, Moodle, Blackboard, Top Hat, Google Classroom.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
AL-AJLAN, A., & ZEDAN, H. (2008). Why Moodle. Proceedings of the 2008 12th IEEE International Workshop on Future Trends of Distributed Computing Systems, 21-23 October 2008. https://doi.org/10.1109/ftdcs.2008.22
ALSALIM, W.A. (2021). Primary school teachers’ adaptation towards ‘madrasati’ Elearning platform during covid-19 crisis. International Journal of Educational Sciences, 32(1-3), 86-94. https://doi.org/10.31901/24566322.2021/32.1-3.1168
BALULA, A., MARQUES, F., and MARTINS, C. (2015). Bet on top hat–challenges to improve language proficiency. Proceedings of EDULEARN15 conference, 6-8 July 2015, pp. 6-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1756.6165
BRADFORD, P., PORCIELLO, M., BALKON, N., & BACKUS, D. (2007). The Blackboard Learning System: The be all and end all in educational instruction? Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 35(3), 301-314. https://doi.org/10.2190/x137-x73l-5261-5656
CALDWELL, J.E. (2007). Clickers in the Large Classroom: Current Research and Best-Practice Tips. CBE — Life Sciences Education, 6(1), 9–20. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.06-12-0205
CARNEVALE, D. (2003). Study of Wisconsin professors finds drawbacks to course management systems. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from https://www.chronicle.com/article/study-of-wisconsin-professors-finds-drawbacks-to-course-management-systems-111131/
CAVUS, N., & ZABADI, T. (2014). A comparison of Open Source Learning Management Systems. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 143, 521-526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.430
COSTA, C., ALVELOS, H., & TEIXEIRA, L. (2012). The use of Moodle e-learning platform: A study in a Portuguese University. Procedia Technology, 5, 334-343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2012.09.037
DASH, S. (2019). Google classroom as a learning management system to teach biochemistry in a medical school. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 47(4), 404-407. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.21246
MOODLE (2018). Moodle architecture. Retrieved from https://docs.moodle.org/dev/Moodle_architecture
DOUCET, M., VRINS, A., & HARVEY, D. (2009). Effect of using an audience response system on learning environment, motivation and long-term retention, during case-discussions in a large group of Undergraduate Veterinary Clinical Pharmacology Students. Medical Teacher, 31(12), e570-e579. https://doi.org/10.3109/01421590903193539
ENDOZO, A.N., OLUYINKA, S., & DAENOS, R.G. (2019). Teachers' experiences towards usage of learning management system. Proceedings of the 2019 11th International Conference on Education Technology and Computers, October 2019, pp. 91–95. https://doi.org/10.1145/3369255.3369257
FATHEMA, N., & AKANDA, M.H. (2020). Effects of instructors’ academic disciplines and prior experience with learning management systems: A study about the use of Canvas. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(4), 113-125. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.5660
GCF GLOBAL (n.d.). Google classroom: Getting started with google classroom. Retrieved from https://edu.gcfglobal.org/en/google-classroom/getting-started-with-google-classroom/1/
HARIYANTO, D. (2014). The design of Adaptive Learning System based on the collaboration of M-learning and e-learning platform. Journal of Advances in Computer Networks, 2(4), 311-314. https://doi.org/10.7763/jacn. 2014.v2.131
IFTAKHAR, S. (2016). Google classroom: what works and how. Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 3(1), 12-18. Retrieved from https://jesoc.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/KC3_35.pdf
KAY, R.H., & LESAGE, A. (2009). Examining the benefits and challenges of using audience response systems: A review of the literature. Computers & Education, 53(3), 819-827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.05.001
KC, D. (2017). Evaluation of Moodle Features at Kajaani University of Applied Sciences – Case Study. Procedia Computer Science, 116, 121–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.10.021
KETUT SUDARSANA, I., BAGUS MADE ANGGARA PUTRA, I., NYOMAN TEMON ASTAWA, I., & WAYAN LALI YOGANTARA, I. (2019). The use of Google classroom in the learning process. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1175, 012165. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1175/1/012165
KHANCHANDANI, K., DHAWAN CHACHRA, S., & NAIKSATAM, A. (2019). A comparative study on Interactive Digital Classrooms: Edmodo and Google. Proceedings of 2019 IEEE Tenth International Conference on Technology for Education, 09-11 December 2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/t4e.2019.00046
KUMAR, S., GANKOTIYA, A.K., & DUTTA, K. (2011). A comparative study of Moodle with other e-learning systems. Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Electronics Computer Technology, 08-10 April 2011. https://doi.org/10.1109/icectech.2011.5942032
LIAW, S. (2008). Investigating students’ perceived satisfaction, behavioral intention, and effectiveness of e-learning: A case study of the Blackboard System. Computers & Education, 51(2), 864-873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.09.005
LUCKE, T., DUNN, P.K., & CHRISTIE, M. (2016). Activating learning in engineering education using ICT and the concept of “Flipping the classroom.” European Journal of Engineering Education, 42(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2016.1201460
MARACHI, R., & QUILL, L. (2020). The case of canvas: Longitudinal datafication through Learning Management Systems. Teaching in Higher Education, 25(4), 418-434. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1739641
MARIANI, C.L., & ROE, S.C. (2021). Use of Top Hat Audience Response Software in a Third-Year Veterinary Medicine and Surgery Course. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 48(1), 27–32. https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme.1117-171r
MORENO, V., CAVAZOTTE, F., & ALVES, I. (2016). Explaining university students’ effective use of e-learning platforms. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(4), 995-1009. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12469
MOUAKKET, S., & BETTAYEB, A.M. (2015). Investigating the factors influencing continuance usage intention of learning management systems by University Instructors. International Journal of Web Information Systems, 11(4), 491-509. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijwis-03-2015-0008
SUKMAWATI, S., & NENSIA, N. (2019). The role of Google classroom in ELT. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studies, 1(2), 142-145. https://doi.org/10.29103/ijevs.v1i2.1526
TELLA, A. (2012). System-related Factors that Predict Students' Satisfaction with the Blackboard Learning System at the University of Botswana. African Journal of Library Archives and Information Science, 22, 41-52. Retrieved from https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ajlais/article/view/106584
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
