The Acceptance of Digital Workforce Environments among Millennials
Abstract
When dealing with the COVID-19 worldwide pandemic, one of the most recent breakthroughs in the evolution of labor, work practices, and workplaces is the digital workforce. As the workplace becomes digital, most companies have reshaped the work environment into a crowdsourcing environment, which allows for collaboration in many new and effective ways. Among those affected by this situation are millennials. Due to the limited job opportunities, they should be wise to strategize and use their skills to survive in these challenging times. Courses on the digital workforce have been introduced in several educational institutions in Malaysia to expose students to the crowdsourcing environment. Thus, a study on millennials' acceptance and use of the digital workforce platforms is important for sustainable social development. A Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) was used to analyze the factors influencing the acceptance and use of digital workforce platforms. The students taking the digital workforce course from the Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Malaysia, were randomly chosen as the sample for this study because of their experiences and familiarity with crowdsourcing platforms. An online self-completion questionnaire was used as the main instrument, and the data received by the respondents were analyzed using the structural equation modeling (SEM) method. The results show that the perceived ease of use significantly affects perceived usefulness. Nevertheless, the perceived usefulness has shown a failure to predict attitude (β = - 0.024, t = 0.213) compared to perceived ease of use. The attitude and perceived usefulness significantly affect the use of the digital workforce platform. Interestingly, perceived ease of use failed to predict the use of the digital platform with β = -0.018, t = 0.436.
Keywords: digital workforce, crowdsourcing platforms, COVID-19, acceptance level, millennials, digital skills, workforce environment.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
ABHIGNA B.S., SONI, N., & DIXIT, S. (2018). Crowdsourcing – A Step towards Advanced Machine Learning. Procedia Computer Science, 132, 632-642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.05.062.
AJZEN, I. (1985). From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior. In KUHL, J., & BECKMANN, J. (eds.) Action Control. SSSP Springer Series in Social Psychology. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 11-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2
ANDERSON, J.C., & GERBING, D.W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
BROWN, T.E. (2018). An Evaluation of Crowdsourcing as a Tool for Marketing Activities. Ph.D. Thesis. Luleå: Luleå University of Technology. Retrieved from https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1265218/FULLTEXT01.pdf
COHEN, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Retrieved from http://www.utstat.utoronto.ca/~brunner/oldclass/378f16/readings/CohenPower.pdf
COLBERT, A., YEE, N., & GEORGE, G. (2016). The Digital Workforce and the Workplace of the Future. Academy of Management Journal, 59, 731-739. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.4003
CONSTANTINIDES, E., LORENZO-ROMERO, C., & ALARCÓN-DEL-AMO, M.-C. (2013). Social Networking Sites as Business Tool: A Study of User Behavior. In GLYKAS, M. (ed.) Business Process Management: Theory and Applications. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 221–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28409-0_9
DAVIS, F.D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived eased of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
DAVIS, F.D., BAGOZZI, R.P., & WARSHAW, P.R. (1989). User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
FORNELL, C., & LARCKER, D. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
GUITTARD, C., SCHENK, E., & BURGER-HELMCHEN, T. (2015). Crowdsourcing and the Evolution of a Business Ecosystem. In GARRIGOS-SIMON, F., GIL-PECHUÁN, I., & ESTELLES-MIGUEL, S. (eds.) Advances in Crowdsourcing. Cham: Springer, pp. 49-62. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18341-1_4
HAIR, J.F., HULT, G.T.M., RINGLE, C.M., & SARSTEDT, M. (2017). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage. Retrieved from https://books.google.ru/books?hl=en&lr=&id=6z83EAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PT11&ots=tmtZhEr7CR&sig=wIYFR1mHfFqZ4CVQsxvFaf_dgxc&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
HOWE, J. (2006). The Rise of Crowdsourcing. WIRED. Retrieved from http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/14.06/crowds.html
IKEDIEGO, H.O., ILKAN, M., ABUBAKAR, A.M., & VICTOR BEKUN, F. (2018). Crowd-sourcing (who, why and what). International Journal of Crowd Science, 2(1), 27-41. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCS-07-2017-0005
INTERNATIONAL LABOUR ORGANIZATION, & ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK. (2020). Tackling the COVID-19 youth employment crisis in Asia and the Pacific. Retrieved from https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/626046/covid-19-youth-employment-crisis-asia-pacific.pdf
LENART-GANSINIEC, R. (2021). The effect of crowdsourcing on organizational learning: Evidence from local governments. Government Information Quarterly, 38(3), 101593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101593
LIN, T.C., HUANG, S.L., & HSU, C.J. (2015). A dual-factor model of loyalty to IT product - The case of smartphones. International Journal of Information Management, 35(2), 215–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.01.001
MALAYSIA DIGITAL ECONOMY CORPORATION. (2020). Digital Workforce COVID Impact Survery 2020. Retrieved from https://mdec.my/wp-content/uploads/Digital-Workforce-Covid-Talent-Impact-Survey-2020.pdf
MOLINO, M., CORTESE, C.G., & GHISLIERI, C. (2020). The Promotion of Technology Acceptance and Work Engagement in Industry 4.0: From Personal Resources to Information and Training. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(7), 2438. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17072438
ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT. (2019). Preparing for the changing nature of work in the digital era. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/going-digital/changing-nature-of-work-in-the-digital-era.pdf
OZKAN-OZEN, Y.D., & KAZANCOGLU, Y. (2021). Analysing workforce development challenges in the Industry 4.0. International Journal of Manpower. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-03-2021-0167
PODSAKOFF, P.M., MACKENZIE, S.B., & PODSAKOFF, N.P. (2012). Sources of Method Bias in Social Science Research and Recommendations on How to Control It. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(1), 539–569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
RASP, S., SCHULZ, H., BONY, S., & STEVENS, B. (2020). Combining Crowdsourcing and Deep Learning to Explore the Mesoscale Organization of Shallow Convection. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 101(11), E1980-E1995. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-19-0324.1
RINGLE, C., WENDE, S., & BECKER, J. (2015). SmartPLS 3. Retrieved from http://www.smartpls.com
SKOUMPOPOULOU, D., WONG, A., NG, P., & LO, M.F. (2018). Factors that affect the acceptance of new technologies in the workplace: a cross case analysis between two universities. The International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology, 14, 209-222. Retrieved from http://ijedict.dec.uwi.edu/viewissue.php?id=52#Refereed_Articles
SOLIMAN, W. (2013). Crowdsourcing as a Sourcing Strategy for the Ambidextrous Organization. The XXIV ISPIM Conference – Innovating in Global Markets: Challenges for Sustainable Growth, Helsinki, 16-19 June 2013. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.3024.0323
SRIVASTAVA, P., & MOSTAFAVI, A. (2018). Challenges and Opportunities of Crowdsourcing and Participatory Planning in Developing Infrastructure Systems of Smart Cities. Infrastructures, 3(4), 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures3040051
TAYLOR, S., & TODD, P.A. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 144-176. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.6.2.144
VENKATESH, V., MORRIS, M.G., DAVIS, G.B., & DAVIS, F.D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
WAGENKNECHT, T., LEVINA, O., & WEINHARDT, C. (2017). Crowdsourcing in a Public Organization: Transformation and Culture. 23rd Americas Conference on Information Systems, Boston. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Thomas-Wagenknecht/publication/317070113_Crowdsourcing_in_a_Public_Organization_Transformation_and_Culture/links/5924470f0f7e9b9979528889/Crowdsourcing-in-a-Public-Organization-Transformation-and-Culture.pdf
WEBPOWER. (2019). Retrieved from https://webpower.psychstat.org/models/kurtosis/results.php?url=c1bb2debbb5c7319c8f588a21b200334
ZAKARIAH, Z., ALIAS, N., ABD AZIZ, M.N., & ISMAIL, N. (2012). E-Learning Awareness in a Higher Learning Institution in Malaysia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 67, 621–625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.368
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.