Imaginative Geographies and the Colonial: David Abrams’ Fobbit

M. Ikbal M. Alosman

Abstract

This study aims to uncover Western imaginative geographies and their colonial practices and implications in David Abrams' Fobbit (2012). It makes visible and contextualizes the invisible agonies of the colonized and revokes the colonial claims. Imaginative geographies refer to the ways in which other spaces, peoples and cultures are represented by the West as serving Western colonial designs and interests in the East. The colonial present indicates the active position of colonialism and its progressive existence in the Middle East, which was reactivated in the aftermath of 9/11. The colonized is formed through architectures of enmity that emphasize imaginaries of difference and fear of the other to instigate the colonial past into a colonial present. I make this argument in two constructs: ‘good Americans,’ which examines the colonial implications of the representation of American soldiers, and ‘bad Arabs,’ which explores the connection between the novel’s portrayal of Arabs and the American colonial presence in Iraq. Despite Abrams’ attempt to expose the means by which the U.S. Army and media polish a rather ugly image of war to make it appealing and heroic; his representation of war, American soldiers, nationals, and Iraq is overshadowed by Western imaginative geographies of the Other that consolidate the colonial present in the Middle East. This study exposes the colonial present and its manifestations as implemented in the novel, making them more visible, questioned and condemned. It gives more insight into the means used to make other spaces and people more antagonistic and thus colonizable.

 

Keywords: colonial present, David Abrams, Iraq War, war novel.

 

DOI: https://doi.org/10.55463/hkjss.issn.1021-3619.61.2


Full Text:

PDF


References


ABRAMS, D. (2012). Fobbit. Canterbury: Black Cat.

ADY, P. (2014). Perimeter Watch: Three American Soldiers Write about the Iraq War. The International Journal of Literary Humanities, 11(2), 37-47. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-7912/CGP/v11i02/43882

ALOSMAN, M.I.M., RAIHANAH, M.M., & HASHIM, R.S. (2018a). Differentiation and imperfectionality in John Updike’s Terrorist. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 24(2), 58-70. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2018-2402-05

ALOSMAN, M.I.M., RAIHANAH, M.M., & HASHIM, R.S. (2018b). Architectures of enmity in Andre Dubus III’s The Garden of Last Days. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies, 18(4), 251-264. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2018-1804-16

BASBANES, N. (2012). Review: David Abrams’ ‘Fobbit’ is an impressive Iraq war satire. Los Angeles Times. Retrieved from https://www.latimes.com/books/la-et-jc-fobbit-david-abrams-book-20120917-story.html, accessed date: 1st March, 2023

BAUMAN, C. (2012). Odd Men Out. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/30/books/review/fobbit-by-david-abrams.html, accessed date: 1st March, 2023

BHABHA, H. (1994). The Location of Culture: Discussing Post-Colonial Culture. New York: Routledge.

BUSCH, B. (2012). Book review: ‘Fobbit’ by David Abrams. Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/entertainment/books/book-review-fobbit-by-david-abrams/2012/10/01/f605d46a-068f-11e2-afff-d6c7f20a83bf_story.html, accessed date: 1st March, 2023

BUSH, G.W. (2003). Text of Bush's Speech. New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2003/05/01/international/worldspecial/text-of-bushs-speech.html, accessed date: 1st March, 2023

FELDMAN, A. (2004). Ground Zero point one: On the cinematics of history. In B. KAPFERER (Ed.), The world trade center and global crisis: Some Critical Perspectives (pp. 26-36). Berghahn Books.

GAFAÏTI, H. (2008). “Hyperculturization” After September 11: The Arab-Muslim World and the West. SubStance, 37(1), 98-117. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/25195158

GREGORY, D. (2004). The Colonial Present. Hoboken: Blackwell.

KALIN, I. (2004). Roots of misconception: Euro-American perceptions of Islam before and after September 11. In J. LUMBARD (Ed.), Islam, fundamentalism, and the betrayal of tradition, revised and expanded: Essays by western Muslim scholars (pp. 143-187). World Wisdom Inc.

KOLLIN, S. (2015). Captivating Westerns: The Middle East in the American West. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

KUMAR, M. P. (2012). Orientalism(s) After 9/11. Journal of Postcolonial Writing, 48(3), pp. 233-240.

KUNSA, A. (2017). Reconstructing the War in Iraq: Post-9/11 American War Fiction in Dialogue with Official-Media Discourse [Doctoral dissertation, Duquesne University]. Duquesne Scholarship Collection. Retrieved from https://dsc.duq.edu/etd/134

MAIRA, S. (2009). “Good” and “Bad” Muslim Citizens: Feminists, Terrorists, and U.S. Orientalisms. Feminist Studies, 35(3), 631-656. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/40608397

MATHONNIERE, J. (2014). War tales that blur the lines but extol the truth: How fiction helps make cogent war stories. War, Literature and the Arts, 26, pp. 1-9. Retrieved from https://scholar.google.co.uk/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=p1p9-5QAAAAJ&citation_for_view=p1p9-5QAAAAJ:W7OEmFMy1HYC

SAID, E. (1979). Orientalism. New York: Pantheon Books.

SEMATI, M. (2010). Islamophobia, Culture and Race in the Age of Empire. Cultural Studies, 24(2), 256-275. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380903541696

SMITH, A. (2006). Heteropatriarchy and The Three Pillars of White Supremacy: Rethinking Women of Color Organizing. In C. MCCANN, S.-K. KIM, & E. ERGUN (Eds.), Feminist Theory Reader (pp. 66-73). New York: Routledge. Retrieved from https://icadvinc.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/heteropatriarchy-and-the-three-pillars-of-white-supremacy.pdf


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.