The Effectiveness of Corrective Feedback in Enhancing EFL Learner Writing Performance
Abstract
This paper explores the effectiveness of corrective feedback from English teachers on EFL learners’ English writing performance. To be precise, it will explain how teacher feedback affects EFL learners’ English grammar learning through English writing. The research adopts a questionnaire survey and tests to have an empirical study. The experiment lasts for ten weeks with one hundred participants who are divided into two groups (one with corrective feedback and the other does not), thus comparing the differences of their English grammar via English writing performances to extract the effectiveness of TSCA and CBI-based model in English writing teaching. The research found that corrective feedback based on TSCA and CBI could effectively improve grammar learning of students in English writing performances. The innovative point of this paper lies in improving the accuracy of grammar rule usage by students and their writing levels via a teacher’s corrective feedback. It will provide a new model for grammar learning for EFL students. This study combines TSCA and CBI to explore the effectiveness of corrective feedback on the grammar learning of students in English writing performances. It will supplement the limitations of current studies and remedy the possible drawbacks of TSCA, thus providing a new teaching mode for English grammar learning.
Keywords: English writing, corrective feedback, direct feedback, indirect feedback.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
BRINTON, D.M., SNOW, M.A., & WESCHE, M.B. (1989). Content-based second language instruction. Boston, Massachusetts: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
CAI, J. (2002). Study of SL acquisition and CBI model. Journal of Beijing International Studies University, March.
CHUMPAVAN, S.A. (2001). Comparative Study of Two English as a Foreign Language (EFL) Programs: Non-Content-Based and Content-Based at the University Level in Thailand. Ph.D. dissertation, Illinois State University.
ELLIS, R., SHEEN, Y., MURAKAMI, M., & TAKASHIMA, H. (2008). The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context. System, 36, 353–371. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2008.02.001
FERRIS, D.R. (1994). Lexical and Syntactic Features of ESL Writing by Students at Different Levels of L2 Proficiency. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 414–420. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587446
FERRIS, D.R. (1999). The Case for Grammar Correction in L2 Writing Classes: A Response to Truscott (1996). Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743%2899%2980110-6
FERRIS, D. (2006). Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the short- and long-term effects of written error correction. In: HYLAND, K., & HYLAND, F. (eds.) Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 81-104. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524742.007
FERRIS, D.R., & HELT, M. (2000). Was Truscott right? New evidence on the effects of error correction in L2 writing classes. Proceedings of the American Association of Applied Linguistics Conference, Vancouver, 11–14 March 2000.
GAO, Y. (2009). The analysis and solutions to problems of college English teaching in big classes. Journal of Zunyi Normal College, 11(1), 93-95.
HAIYANG, S., & WENBO, Q. (2022). The Impact of Corrective Feedback on Writing Accuracy and Language Knowledge Acquisition of College English Learners. Chinese Applied Linguistics (English), 45(3), 18.
KASPER, L.F. (1994). Improved Reading Performance for ESL Students through Academic Course Pairing. Journal of Reading, 5, 376-384. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/40032206
KASPER, L.F. (1997). The Impact of Content-Based Instructional Programs on the Academic Progress of ESL Students. English for Specific Purposes, 4, 309-320. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(97)00035-5
LALANDE, J.F. (1982). Reducing composition errors: An experiment. Modern Language Journal, 66, 140-149. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1944-9720.1984.TB01715.X
LEAVER, B.L., & STRYKER, S.B. (1989). Content-Based Instruction for Foreign Language Classrooms. Foreign Language Annals, 22(3), 269-275. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1989.tb02746.x
LEE, L. (2002). Enhancing Learners' Communication Skills through Synchronous Electronic Interaction and Task-Based Instruction. Foreign Language Annals, 35(1), 16-24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2002.tb01829.x
LIBERTY, L.M., & CONDERMAN, G. (2018). Using the Self-regulated Strategy Development Model to Support Middle-level Writing. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 91(3), 118-123. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2018.1426303
LIGHTBOWN, P.M. (2000). Anniversary Article. Classroom SLA Research and Second Language Teaching. Applied Linguistics, 21(4), 431-462. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/21.4.431
MOHAN, B.A. (1986). Language and Content. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.
SCHMIDT, R. (1994). Deconstructing Consciousness in Search of Useful Definitions for Applied Linguistics. Consciousness in Second Language Learning, 11, 237-326.
TRUSCOTT, J. (1996). The Case against Grammar Correction in L2 Writing Classes. Language Learning, 46(2), 327–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1996.tb01238.x
TRUSCOTT, J. (1999). The case for “The Case against Grammar Correction in L2 Writing Classes”: A response to Ferris. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(2), 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80124-6
WANG, S.X. (1994). CBI - the direction of professional English reading teaching. Shanghai: Foreign Languages, 2, 27-31.
YAMASHITA, T. (2021). Corrective feedback in computer-mediated collaborative writing and revision contributions. Language Learning & Technology, 25(2), 75–93. Retrieved from https://www.lltjournal.org/item/10125-73434/
YAN, L. (2021). A comparative study of college English writing teacher feedback and online correction feedback. Journal of Heilongjiang Teachers Development Institute, 3, 151-153.
YICHEN, W. (2022). On the Effectiveness of Different Types of Written Corrective Feedback Applied in College English Writing Classes. Western Journal, 9, 4-8.
YU, L., & HAN, J. (2003). Enlightenment of Project-Based Teaching in Ottawa. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 6.
ZOU, Q. (2019). A corpus-based study of verb-noun collocation errors in Chinese non-English majors’ writings. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Contemporary Education, Social Sciences and Humanities, Moscow, 17-19 May 2019, pp. 835-838. https://doi.org/10.2991/iccessh-19.2019.188
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.