Predictive Factors of Cyberbullying and Cybervictimization
Abstract
Due to the increasing prevalence of cyberbullying in Thailand, this research aims to study the influence of ICT self-efficacy, grandiose narcissism, self-esteem, and empathy on cyberbullying and cybervictimization, incorporating perspectives from both perpetrators and victims for a comprehensive analysis. Additionally, it investigates the mediating role of empathy in the relationship between grandiose narcissism and cyberbullying behavior. The sample comprises 395 individuals aged 18–24 years, residing in Bangkok and its metropolitan area in Thailand, selected through convenience sampling. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was employed using SPSS and Lisrel. The results revealed that ICT self-efficacy has a direct and significant positive effect on cyberbullying and negative effect on cybervictimization at the .01 level. Grandiose narcissism has a direct effect on cyberbullying and cybervictimization and an indirect effect on cyberbullying through empathy, with statistical significance at the .01 level. Empathy was found to have a negative effect on cyberbullying, suggesting that fostering empathy could mitigate cyberbullying behaviors. Meanwhile, self-esteem showed no significant effect on cyberbullying and cybervictimization, highlighting potential limitations in traditional self-esteem measures. Conversely, grandiose narcissism emerged as a more effective predictor of cyberbullying. This study identifies key factors that contribute to cyberbullying and cybervictimization, explores potential factors that may help reduce cyberbullying among adolescents, and highlights areas that have been less studied in certain regions, including Thailand.
Keywords: Cyberbullying, ICT self-efficacy, Grandiose narcissism, Self-esteem, Empathy
Full Text:
PDFReferences
ANDERSON, C.A., & BUSHMAN, B.J. (2002). Human aggression. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 27–51. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135231
ANDERSON, M., & JIANG, J. (2018). Teens, social media & technology 2018. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from https://apo.org.au/node/175701
BANDURA, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
BANDURA, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman.
BAUMAN, S., TOOMEY, R.B., & WALKER, J. (2018). Cyberbullying: A review of the literature. The Handbook of Child and Adolescent Bullying, 3, 75-92.
BREWER, G., & KERSLAKE, J. (2015). Cyberbullying, self-esteem, empathy and loneliness. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 255-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.073
BRUMMELMAN, E., THOMAES, S., & SEDIKIDES, C. (2016). Separating narcissism from self-esteem. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25(1), 8–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721415619737
BURNS, D.D. (2017). Feeling good: The new mood therapy. HarperCollins.
BUSSEY, K., FITZPATRICK, S., & RAMAN, A. (2015). The role of moral disengagement and self-efficacy in cyberbullying. Journal of School Violence, 14(1), 30–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2014.954045
COHEN, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
COOK, C.R., WILLIAMS, K.R., GUERRA, N.G., KIM, T.E., & SADEK, S. (2015). Predictors of bullying and victimization in childhood and adolescence: A meta-analytic investigation. School Psychology Quarterly, 25(2), 65–83. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020149
ÇETIN, F.H., ÇELIK, S.H., & ŞAHIN, E. (2011). Bullying and cyberbullying among adolescents: The role of parental involvement. Journal of Social Issues, 67(3), 640–661. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2011.01722.x
DAVIS, M.H. (2017). Empathy: A social psychological approach. 3rd ed. Routledge.
DECETY, J., & COWELL, J.M. (2014). The complex relation between morality and empathy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(7), 299-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.02.008
DEHUE, F., BOLMAN, C., & VÖLLINK, T. (2008). Cyberbullying: Youngsters’ Experiences and Parental Perception. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11(2), 217–223. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2007.0008
ELECTRONIC TRANSACTIONS DEVELOPMENT AGENCY (2020). ETDA reveals IUB 2020 survey: Thais use the internet for almost half a day, with COVID-19 playing a role. Retrieved from https://www.etda.or.th/th/newsevents/pr-news/ETDA-released-IUB-2020.aspx
FALLA, D., ROMERA, E.M., & ORTEGA-RUIZ, R. (2021). The role of empathy in predicting bullying and aggressive behaviors: A longitudinal study. Journal of Adolescence, 87, 10-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2021.03.004
FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY (2017). Cyberbullying research. Journal of Adolescent Health, 61(2), 147–155.
HAIR, J.F., BLACK, W.C., BABIN, B.J., & ANDERSON, R.E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. 7th ed. New York: Pearson.
HEPPER, E.G., HART, C.M., MEEK, R., CISEK, S., & SEDIKIDES, C. (2014). Narcissism and Empathy in Young Offenders and Non–Offenders. European Journal of Personality, 28(2), 201-210. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1939
HINDUJA, S., & PATCHIN, J.W. (2015a). Bullying beyond the schoolyard: Preventing and responding to cyberbullying. 2nd ed. SAGE Publications.
HINDUJA, S., & PATCHIN, J.W. (2015b). Bullying, cyberbullying, and suicide. Archives of Suicide Research, 19(2), 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2015.1011236
HYATT, C.S., SLEEP, C.E., LAMKIN, J., MAPLES-KELLER, J.L., SEDIKIDES, C., CAMPBELL, W.K., & MILLER, J.D. (2018). Narcissism and self-esteem: A nomological network analysis. PLoS ONE, 13(8), e0201088. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201088
JOLLIFFE, D., & FARRINGTON, D.P. (2006). Empathy and offending: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 11(5), 441-476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2003.03.001
KLINE, R.B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. 3rd ed. New York: Guilford Press.
KOWALSKI, R.M., LIMBER, S.P., & AGATSTON, P.W. (2014). Cyberbullying: Bullying in the digital age. 2nd ed. Wiley-Blackwell.
KRÄMER, N.C., FEURSTEIN, D., KLUCK, J.P., & MEIER, Y. (2017). Beware of selfies: The impact of photo type on impression formation based on social networking profiles. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 188. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00188
LEI, L., LIU, M., ZHANG, Z., & ZHANG, Y. (2019). Cyberbullying perpetration and victimization among elementary school students: Longitudinal associations with executive function and cyberbullying-related attitude. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2312. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02312
MCCAIN, J.L., & CAMPBELL, W.K. (2016). Narcissism and social media use: A meta-analytic review. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 7(3), 308–327. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000137
MUSHARRAF, S., ANIS-UL-HAQUE, M., & SETHI, R. (2019). Cyberbullying in different participant roles: Exploring differences in psychopathology and well-being in university students. Pakistan Journal of Psychological Research, 34(1), 151–169.
NATIONAL STATISTICAL OFFICE OF THAILAND (2023). The 2023 household survey on the use of information (Quarter 4). Retrieved from https://www.nso.go.th/nsoweb//storagesurvey_detail/2024/20240229135937_44161.pdf
OLWEUS, D., & LIMBER, S.P. (2018). Some problems with cyberbullying research. Current Opinion in Psychology, 19, 139–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.04.012
PATCHIN, J.W., & HINDUJA, S. (2015). Cyberbullying among youth: A comprehensive review of the literature. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 13(3), 263–275. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204013510932
PATCHIN, J.W., & HINDUJA, S. (2019). The decline of cyberbullying among teens: An analysis of the 2019 National Cyberbullying Survey. Journal of Adolescent Health, 65(3), 340–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.06.001
PHUAPONGSAKORN, N. (2020). Revealing the statistics of Thai children heavily affected by cyberbullying! The global ranking average. Prachachat Business. Retrieved from https://teroasia.com/news/194261?ref=news
PORNPADON, C. (2018). Cyberbullying among Thai youth and risks in the 4.0 era. Prachachat Business. Retrieved from https://www.prachachat.net/facebook-instant-article/news-146845
RAFFERTY, A., & VANDER VEN, T. (2014). ‘I hate everything about you’: A qualitative examination of cyberbullying and on-line aggression in a college sample. Deviant Behavior, 35(5), 364–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2013.849171
ROSENBERG, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
ROSENTHAL, J.A., & BARBOUR, A.C. (2019). The relationships among cyberbullying, traditional bullying, and self-esteem in adolescents. Journal of School Health, 89(3), 211-219.
SCHERER, R., & SIDDIQ, F. (2015). Revisiting teachers’ self-efficacy and ICT integration in education: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 9, 17-36.
SINCLAIR, L., FEHR, B., & SARGENT, M. (2017). Empathy as a predictor of moral behavior. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 34(5), 457-474. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407517732743
SRIWATTANAPONG, W., & THANNINPONG, P. (2015). The influence of electronic media and the internet on bullying behavior among students in schools in Mueang District, Chiang Mai Province. NIDA Journal of Communication and Management, 1(2), 128-144.
TABER, K.S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
VRANJES, I., BAILLIEN, E., VANDEBOSCH, H., ERREYGERS, S., & DE WITTE, H. (2017). The dark side of working online: Towards a definition and an emotion reaction model of workplace cyberbullying. Computers in Human Behavior, 69, 324–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.055
WONGPAKARAN, N., & WONGPAKARAN, T. (2012). The role of self-esteem and empathy in cyberbullying among Thai adolescents. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 17(4), 337-347. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2012.681523
ZAJENKOWSKI, M., WITOWSKA, J., MACIANTOWICZ, O., & MALESZA, M. (2018). Vulnerable and grandiose narcissism are differently related to intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 121, 170–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.09.025
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.