Is It Necessary for Indonesia to Modify Its Corporate Tax Payment Model? A Comparative Study

Novianti, Gatot Soepriyanto

Abstract

This study aims to suggest recommendations for Indonesia and other low-tax-ratio countries to enhance their corporate taxation system, specifically focusing on the tax installment system. While various research explored taxation, only limited attention was directed to the effectiveness of the corporate tax payment system. This paper uses a literature review from authoritative websites, related news, existing studies, and interviews with tax professionals. Data were analyzed by a comparative analysis of the corporate tax payment model between developing and developed countries that implement a self-assessment system; results from interviews were also utilized to strengthen the comparative findings. It is necessary to modify the tax installment regulations for Indonesian corporate taxpayers to improve their compliance, resulting in a subsequent influence on the tax ratio. The outcomes of this study consist of several insights for researchers and tax authorities about taxation system that have potential to be implement in other low-tax-ratio countries, particularly in Indonesia, to increase the tax ratio and tax revenue. This study utilizes both developing and developed countries as samples for a comparison focusing on countries with higher tax ratios, aiming to achieve optimal results.

 

Keywords: corporate taxpayer, installment tax, tax refund, self-assessment system, tax ratio.

 

DOI: https://doi.org/10.55463/hkjss.issn.1021-3619.62.11


Full Text:

PDF


References


ABUSELIDZE, G. (2020). Optimality of tax policy on the basis of comparative analysis of income taxation. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 9(1), pp. 272-293. https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2020.v9n1p272

CHAU, D. (2009). Understanding The Compliance Behaviour of Malaysian Individual Taxpayers Using a Mixed Method Approach. Journal of the Australasian Tax Teachers Association, Vol.4 No.1: 181-202

KOESMOELJANA, B. (2021) wide ranging taxation changes in Indonesia under Tax Regulation Harmonization Law. Ernst & Young. https://www.ey.com/en_id/tax-service/wide-ranging-taxation-changes-in-indonesia-under-tax-regulation-

FELTHAM, G., & MACNAUGHTON, A. (2000). Optimal payment strategy for corporate income tax instalments. Can. Tax J., 48, 60.

HM REVENUE & CUSTOMS (2023). The United Kingdom Government. https://www.gov.uk/

HUBBELL, A. P., & CHORY‐ASSAD, R. M. (2005). Motivating factors: Perceptions of justice and their relationship with managerial and organizational trust. Communication Studies, 56(1), pp. 47-70.

INLAND REVENUE BOARD OF MALAYSIA (2022). LHDN Malaysia. https://www.hasil.gov.my/

INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE (2023). Official Website of the United States Government. https://www.irs.gov/

ISA, K. (2014). Tax complexities in the Malaysian corporate tax system: Minimise to maximise. International Journal of Law and Management, 56(1), pp. 50-65. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-08-2013-0036

KASTLUNGER, B., LOZZA, E., KIRCHLER, E., & SCHABMANN, A. (2013). Powerful authorities and trusting citizens: The Slippery Slope Framework and tax compliance in Italy. Journal of Economic Psychology, 34, pp. 36-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2012.11.007

KIRCHLER, E. (2007). The Economic Psychology of Tax Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

KIRCHLER, E., HOELZL, E., & WAHL, I. (2008). Enforced versus voluntary tax compliance: The “slippery slope” framework. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(2), pp. 210-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2007.05.004

KIRCHLER, E., NIEMIROWSKI, A., & WEARING, A. (2006). Shared subjective views, intent to cooperate and tax compliance: Similarities between Australian taxpayers and tax officers. Journal of Economic Psychology, 27(4), pp. 502-517.

OECD (2022). Revenue Statistics 2022 - the United Kingdom. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development [Electronic Version]. https://www.oecd.org/tax/revenue-statistics-united-kingdom.pdf

OECD (2022). Revenue Statistics 2022 - the United States. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. [Electronic Version]. https://www.oecd.org/tax/revenue-statistics-united-states.pdf

OECD (2022). Revenue Statistics 2022 - Australia. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. [Electronic Version]. https://www.oecd.org/tax/revenue-statistics-australia.pdf

OECD (2022). Revenue Statistics in Asia and the Pacific 2022 - Indonesia. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. [Electronic Version]. https://www.oecd.org/tax/tax-policy/revenue-statistics-asia-and-pacific-indonesia.pdf

OECD (2022). Revenue Statistics in Asia and the Pacific 2022 - Malaysia. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. [Electronic Version]. https://www.oecd.org/tax/tax-policy/revenue-statistics-asia-and-pacific-malaysia.pdf

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS (2022). Worldwide Tax Summaries: Australia Corporate Tax. https://taxsummaries.pwc.com/australia

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS (2022). Worldwide Tax Summaries: Indonesia Corporate Tax. https://taxsummaries.pwc.com/indonesia

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS (2022). Worldwide Tax Summaries: Malaysia Corporate Tax. https://taxsummaries.pwc.com/malaysia

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS (2022). Worldwide Tax Summaries: Thailand Corporate Tax. https://taxsummaries.pwc.com/thailand

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS (2022). Worldwide Tax Summaries: United Kingdom Corporate Tax. https://taxsummaries.pwc.com/united-kingdom

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS (2022). Worldwide Tax Summaries: United States Corporate Tax. https://taxsummaries.pwc.com/united-states

THE REVENUE DEPARTMENT (2022). Thailand Tax Authorities. https://www.rd.go.th/english/6044.htm


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.